
A poorly drafted arbitration clause produces nothing but more disputes about the dispute. The seat, language, rules, and law need careful selection.
A favourable foreign award is only as valuable as your ability to enforce it where the assets are. Vietnamese enforcement procedure is reasonable but precise.
International arbitration involves coordinating counsel, evidence, witnesses, and assets across multiple jurisdictions — and the right Vietnamese counsel is the anchor for the Vietnamese leg of all of it.
For most cross-border commercial disputes connected to Vietnam, international arbitration is the right forum. It is faster than Vietnamese litigation. It allows parties to choose neutral, expert arbitrators. It is conducted in a language the parties choose — typically English. It is confidential. And — most consequentially — its awards are enforceable globally under the 1958 New York Convention, to which Vietnam has been a party since 1995.
I represent foreign clients in international arbitration before the Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC), the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), and ad hoc UNCITRAL tribunals. My practice covers the full lifecycle of an arbitration: from drafting the arbitration clause at the contract stage, through commencement and tribunal constitution, evidentiary hearings, award, and — increasingly — enforcement of foreign awards in Vietnam.
Beyond the procedural mechanics, the strategic dimension of arbitration matters greatly. The choice of seat, language, governing law, and institutional rules — made years before any dispute — has enormous consequences when the dispute arrives. A well-drafted arbitration clause can mean the difference between a clean award enforceable across borders and a procedural nightmare that costs years and millions to untangle. I work both sides of this: drafting clauses that work and litigating around clauses that don't.
Vietnam's arbitration framework has matured significantly. The 2010 Law on Commercial Arbitration brought Vietnamese arbitration substantially into line with the UNCITRAL Model Law, and VIAC has emerged as a sophisticated regional arbitration centre with multilingual procedures, an experienced panel of arbitrators, and rules consistent with international best practice. For disputes connected to Vietnam, VIAC is often the optimal forum: regionally located, familiar with Vietnamese law and language, and producing awards that are enforced as readily abroad as in Vietnam.
The 1958 New York Convention is the cornerstone of international arbitration enforcement. It obliges contracting states to recognise and enforce arbitral awards from other contracting states, subject only to narrow grounds for refusal. Vietnam has been a party since 1995, and the Vietnamese courts have a generally good track record of enforcing foreign arbitral awards under the Convention. This is precisely the protection that international parties to Vietnamese transactions need: a final binding decision they can enforce against the Vietnamese counterparty's assets in Vietnam.
Equally, foreign awards do not enforce themselves. Recognition and enforcement under the New York Convention requires a formal application to the competent Vietnamese court (typically the Provincial People's Court), filing of the original or certified copies of the award and arbitration agreement, certified translation, and a hearing on whether any of the narrow refusal grounds applies. I handle this enforcement work for foreign clients regularly — and it is an area where local procedural fluency materially affects outcome.
My practice is structured around the specific needs of clients who are new to — or unfamiliar with — Vietnam's legal system.
Foreign-invested or overseas companies in commercial disputes with Vietnamese counterparties, where the contract has — or should have — an arbitration clause.
Foreign investors whose Vietnamese investments have suffered government-related interference and who are considering investor-state arbitration under bilateral investment treaties.
Foreign parties holding favourable arbitral awards (foreign or Vietnamese) seeking recognition and enforcement against assets in Vietnam.
Drafting arbitration clauses for international commercial contracts — institutional choice (VIAC, SIAC, ICC), seat, language, governing law, expert tribunal selection, and emergency-arbitrator provisions.
No surprises, no hidden steps. Here's exactly what happens after you reach out.
Reviewing the contract and dispute, advising on forum, costs, timeline, and prospects of success. Written assessment within two weeks.
1-2 weeksFiling the request for arbitration, response, and constitution of the tribunal. Often includes early procedural skirmishes over jurisdiction or interim measures.
2-4 monthsSubmission of statements of case and defence, document production, witness statements, expert reports, and the merits hearing.
6-12 monthsFinal award issuance, payment by the losing party, or enforcement through Vietnamese or foreign courts as required.
2-12 months
Whether you need to commence arbitration, defend an arbitration, enforce an award, or simply draft a clause that will work — get a confidential strategic assessment.
Office Hours: Mon-Fri, 8:30 AM - 6:00 PM (GMT+7, Indochina Time)